Asistencia ventricular de larga duración en España (2007-2020). I informe del registro REGALAD / Durable ventricular assist device in Spain (2007-2020). First report of the REGALAD registry

Introducción y objetivos Se presentan las características clínicas, los resultados y las complicaciones de todos los pacientes a los que se implantó un dispositivo de asistencia circulatoria mecánica de larga duración en España entre 2007 y 2020. Métodos Análisis a partir del Registro español de asistencia ventricular de larga duración (REGALAD) en el que participaron los centros españoles con programa de asistencia ventricular mecánica. Resultado En este periodo se implantaron 263 dispositivos de asistencia ventricular de larga duración en 22 hospitales. En 182 pacientes (69%) la asistencia fue ventricular izquierda de flujo continuo; en 79 (30%), de flujo pulsátil (58 izquierdas y 21 biventriculares), y en 2 (1%) se implantó un corazón artificial total. El objetivo de la asistencia fue el puente al trasplante en 78 pacientes (30%), puente a la candidatura en 110 (42%), puente a la recuperación en 3 (1%) y la terapia de destino en 72 (27%). La supervivencia total a 6, 12 y 24 meses fue del 79, el 74 y el 69% respectivamente, y la mejor se consiguió con las asistencias izquierdas de flujo continuo (el 84, el 80 y el 75%). Las principales complicaciones asociadas fueron: infecciones (el 37% de los pacientes), hemorragias (35%), neurológicas (29%) y disfunción de la asistencia (17%). Conclusiones Las asistencias ventriculares de larga duración han irrumpido en España como un tratamiento útil en la insuficiencia cardiaca avanzada. Como en otros registros internacionales, se tiende a utilizar dispositivos izquierdos intracorpóreos de flujo continuo, que se asocian con mejores resultados. Las complicaciones relacionadas siguen siendo frecuentes y graves (AU)

Introduction and objectives This report presents the clinical characteristics, outcomes and complications of all consecutive patients implanted with a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in Spain between 2007 and 2020. Methods Analysis of the Spanish Registry of durable ventricular assist devices (REGALAD) including data form Spanish centers with a mechanical circulatory support program. Results During the study period, 263 ventricular assist devices were implanted in 22 hospitals. The implanted device was an isolated continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in 182 patients (69%), a pulsatile-flow device (58 isolated left ventricular and 21 biventricular) in 79 (30%), and a total artificial heart in 2 patients (1%). The strategy of the implant was as bridge to heart transplant in 78 patients (30%), bridge to candidacy in 110 (42%), bridge to recovery in 3 (1%) and destination therapy in 72 patients (27%). Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 79%, 74% and 69%, respectively, and was better in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (84%, 80%, and 75%). The main adverse events related to this therapy were infections (37% of patients), bleeding (35%), neurological (29%), and device malfunction (17%). Conclusions Durable ventricular assist devices have emerged in Spain in the last few years as a useful therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. As in other international registries, the current trend is to use continuous-flow intracorporeal left ventricular devices, which are associated with better results. Adverse events continue to be frequent and severe (AU)

Durable ventricular assist device in Spain (2007-2020). First report of the REGALAD registry.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: This report presents the clinical characteristics, outcomes and complications of all consecutive patients implanted with a long-term mechanical circulatory support device in Spain between 2007 and 2020. METHODS: Analysis of the Spanish Registry of durable ventricular assist devices (REGALAD) including data form Spanish centers with a mechanical circulatory support program. RESULTS: During the study period, 263 ventricular assist devices were implanted in 22 hospitals. The implanted device was an isolated continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in 182 patients (69%), a pulsatile-flow device (58 isolated left ventricular and 21 biventricular) in 79 (30%), and a total artificial heart in 2 patients (1%). The strategy of the implant was as bridge to heart transplant in 78 patients (30%), bridge to candidacy in 110 (42%), bridge to recovery in 3 (1%) and destination therapy in 72 patients (27%). Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 79%, 74% and 69%, respectively, and was better in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (84%, 80%, and 75%). The main adverse events related to this therapy were infections (37% of patients), bleeding (35%), neurological (29%), and device malfunction (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Durable ventricular assist devices have emerged in Spain in the last few years as a useful therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. As in other international registries, the current trend is to use continuous-flow intracorporeal left ventricular devices, which are associated with better results. Adverse events continue to be frequent and severe.

Usefulness of Impella support in different clinical settings in cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND: The Impella pump has emerged as a promising tool in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Despite its attractive properties, there are scarce data on the specific clinical setting and the potential role of Impella devices in CS patients from routine clinical practice. METHODS: This is an observational, retrospective, single center, cohort study. All consecutive patients with diagnosis of CS and undergoing support with Impella 2.5®, Impella CP® or Impella 5.0® from April 2015 to December 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics, management and outcomes were assessed according to CS severity, age and cause of CS. Main outcome measured was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included (median age: 59.3 ± 10 years). The most common cause of CS was acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (68%), followed by decompensation of previous cardiomyopathy (22%). A total of 13 patients (26%) had profound CS. Most patients (54%) improved pulmonary congestion at 48 h after Impella support. A total of 19 patients (38%) presented significant bleeding. In-hospital mortality was 42%. Among patients with profound CS (n = 13), five patients were previously supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. A total of eight patients (61.5%) died during the admission, and no patient achieved ventricular recovery. Older patients (≥ 67 years, n = 10) had more comorbidities and the highest mortality (70%). Among patients with ACS (n = 34), 35.3% of patients had profound CS; and in most cases (52.9%), Impella support was performed as a bridge to recovery. In contrast, only one patient from the decompensated cardiomyopathy group (n = 11) presented with profound CS. In 90.9% of these cases, Impella support was used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. There were no cases of death. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of real-life CS patients, Impella devices were used in different settings, with different clinical profiles and management. Despite a significant rate of complications, mortality was acceptable and lower than those observed in other series.